What's going on?
If you listen to well-paid spokespeople of the vaccine industry, you’ll
hear that the case is closed on the link between vaccines and autism
and that the scientific consensus supports no association. It’s eerily
reminiscent of the days when tobacco companies produced a consensus of
science showing no link between smoking and lung cancer.
But, calmer voices like Dr. Bernadine Healy, the former Director of the NIH, are rising up and challenging this rhetoric.
Where is the truth? Like everything else in life, the devil is in the
details. The "fourteen studies' are being misrepresented by public
health officials who are trying to save the current vaccine program,
which has ballooned from 10 vaccines in the 1980s to 36 today, a 260%
increase. During this same time, autism rates have gone from 1 in 10,000
to 1 in 110, a 9,000%, or 90-fold increase.
By reading and analyzing every published study used to "prove" vaccines do not cause autism, this website will show you that:
- No real world studies of the vaccine schedule have ever been done.
Of the 11 separate vaccines given to American children (many given
multiple times), only one vaccine -- the MMR -- has ever been studied
for its relationship to autism. Yet, American children get 6 or 7
different vaccines simultaneously at 2, 4, 6, and 12 month doctor
appointments.
- Not one study compares vaccinated children to unvaccinated children
-- every study only looks at children who have received vaccines. This
is like comparing smokers who smoke one pack a day to those who smoke
two packs a day, seeing no difference in cancer rates, and saying
cigarettes don’t cause cancer.
- The studies are rife with conflicts including authors who have been
paid by vaccine companies and federal agencies and foreign governments
charged with administering vaccines.
- Many of the studies reach false conclusions or conclusions that
have nothing to do with the simple question: do vaccines cause autism?
They are simply being misrepresented in the press by public health
officials taking advantage of a docile media that is heavily dependent
on advertising from pharma companies.
|